This article explores humour employed as a self-presentation device in the biography section of Tinder profiles belonging to heterosexual users (male and female) in their 20s based in Spain and the United Kingdom. The main purpose of this investigation is to find out if male or female users are more prone to resorting to humour in their Tinder profiles and if the culture within which this interaction takes place also affects the frequency of use of humorous remarks. More specifically, we intend to answer the following research questions: (i) To what extent does gender influence the use of humour as an online self-presentation strategy?, (ii) To what extent does the users’ cultural context play a role in the frequency and way humour is employed? To that purpose, a total of 455 Tinder profiles from both Spanish (224) and UK (231) users was gathered with the help of a bot, Tinderbotz, and it was then analysed quantitatively and qualitatively with the assistance of the software program Atlas.ti. The results show that UK users favour humour as a self-presentation strategy in a significantly higher percentage than their Spanish counterparts, independently of their gender. Thus, while Spanish-speakers may regard humour as a risky mechanism that can backfire, UK users embrace it as part of the Anglo-Saxon ethos of not taking oneself too seriously.
Arias, V., & Punyanunt-Carter, N. (2018). Online dating/dating apps. In M. Khosrow-Pour, (Ed.), Advanced methodologies and technologies in media and communications (pp. 7069-7076). IGI Global.
Attardo, S. (1994). Linguistic theories of humour. Mouton de Gruyter.
Attardo, S. (2001). Humorous texts: A semantic and pragmatic analysis. Humor Research Series, 6. Mouton de Gruyter.
Attardo, S. (2008). A primer for the linguistics of humor. In V. Raskin (Ed.). The primer of humor research (pp. 101-155). Mouton de Gruyter.
Attrill, A. (2012). Sharing only parts of me: Selective categorical self-disclosure across Internet arenas. International Journal of Internet Science, 7(1), 55-77.
Barrada, J. R., & Castro, Á. (2020). Tinder users: Sociodemographic, psychological, and psychosexual characteristics. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(21), 8047.
Barrett, R. (2017). From drag queens to leathermen: Language, gender, and gay male subcultures. Oxford University Press.
Boxer, D., & Cortés-Conde, F. (1997). From bonding and biting: Conversational joking and identity display. Journal of Pragmatics, 23, 275-295.
Chang, W. L. M., & Haugh, M. (2020). The metapragmatics of “teasing” in Taiwanese Chinese conversational humour. The European Journal of Humour Research, 8(4), 7-30.
Chen, G., & Martin, R. (2007). A comparison of humor styles, coping humor, and mental health between Chinese and Canadian university students. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 20(3), 215-234.
Chu, S. C., & Choi, S. M. (2010). Social capital and self-presentation on social networking sites: A comparative study of Chinese and American young generations. Chinese Journal of Communication, 3(4), 402-420.
Collins, L.C. (2019). Dating apps: A Tinder corpus in Corpus Linguistics for Online Communication: A Guide for Research (1st ed.) (pp. 170-188). Routledge.
del‐Teso‐Craviotto, M. (2006). Language and sexuality in Spanish and English dating chats 1. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 10(4), 460-480.
Drew, P. (1987). Po-faced receipts of teases. Linguistics, 25, 219-253.
Duguay, S. (2017). Dressing up Tinderella: Interrogating authenticity claims on the mobile dating app Tinder. Information, Communication & Society, 20(3), 351-367.
Dynel, M. (2008). No aggression, only teasing: The pragmatics of teasing and banter. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 4(2), 241-261.
Dynel, M. (2009b). Beyond a joke: Types of conversational humour. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(5), 1284-1299.
Dynel, M. (2013). A view on humour theory. In M. Dynel (Ed.), Developments in linguistic humour theory (pp. 7-15). John Benjamins.
Dynel, M. (2016). “I has seen Image Macros!” Advice Animals memes as visual-verbal jokes. International Journal of Communication, 10, 660-688.
Forabosco, G. (1992). Cognitive aspects of the humor process: The concept of incongruity. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 5(1–2), 45–68.
Frew, E. (2006). The humour tourist: A conceptualisation. Journal of Business Research, 59(5), 643-646.
Gábor, O., Benyó, M., Berkes, B., Nikoletti, E., Gál, É.,Tóth-Király, I., & Bőthe, B. (2018). The personality, motivation and need-based background of problematic Tinder use. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 7, 1-17.
García-Gómez, A. (2020). Discursive representation of masculinity and femininity in Tinder and Grindr: Hegemonic masculinity, feminine devaluation and femmephobia. Discourse & Society, 31(4), 390-410.
Goddard, C. (2020). De-Anglicising humour studies. The European Journal of Humour Research, 8(4), 48-58.
Hall, K. (2019). Middle class timelines: Ethnic humor and sexual modernity in Delhi. Language in Society, 48(4), 491-517.
Haugh, M. (2010). Jocular mockery, (dis)affiliation, and face. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(8), 2106-2119.
Haugh, M. (2017). Teasing. In S. Attardo (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and humor (pp. 204-218). Routledge.
Haugh, M., & Bousfield, D. (2012). Mock impoliteness, jocular mockery and jocular abuse in Australian and British English. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(9), 1099-1114.
Hess, A., & Flores, C. (2018). Simply more than swiping left: A critical analysis of toxic masculine performances on Tinder Nightmares. New Media & Society, 20(3), 1085-1102.
Hobbs M., Owen S., & Gerber L. (2017). Liquid love? Dating apps, sex, relationships and the digital transformation of intimacy. Journal of Sociology, 53(2), 271-284.
Hofmann, J., Platt, T., Lau, C., & Torres-Marín, J. (2023). Gender differences in humor-related traits, humor appreciation, production, comprehension, (neural) responses, use, and correlates: A systematic review. Current Psychology, 42, 16451–16464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00724-1
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences, (2nd ed). Sage.
Hübler, M. T., & Bell, D. C. (2003). Computer-mediated humor and Ethos: Exploring threads of constitutive laughter in online communities. Computers and Composition, 20(3), 277–294.
Iglesias Recuero, S. (2017). Politeness studies on peninsular Spanish. In M. E. Placencia & C. García (Eds.), Research on politeness in the Spanish-speaking world (pp. 21-34). Routledge.
Jiang, T., Li, H., & Hou, Y. (2019). Cultural differences in humor perception, usage, and implications. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00123
Jonsson, M. (2021). Tinder communication in the time of COVID-19 [MA Dissertation]. Retrieved from http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-47129
Kim, J., & Dindia, K. (2011). Online self-disclosure: A review of research. In K. B. Wright & L. M. Webb (Eds.), Computer-mediated communication in personal relationships (pp. 156-180). Peter Lang.
Koestler, A. (1964). The act of creation. Macmillan.
Kotthoff, H. (2000). Gender and joking: On the complexities of women’s image politics in humorous narratives. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(1), 55-80.
Kotthoff, H. (2006). Gender and humor: The state of the art. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(1), 4-25.
Kozinets, R.V. (2015). Netnography. Doing ethnography research online. 2nd edition. Sage.
Kuipers, G. (2006). The social construction of digital danger: debating, defusing and inflating the moral dangers of online humor and pornography in the Netherlands and the United States. New Media & Society, 8(3), 379-400.
Lampert, M. D., & Ervin-Tripp, S. M. (2006). Risky laughter: teasing and self-directed joking among male and female friends. Journal of Pragmatics, 38, 51-72
Linares-Bernabéu, E. (2019). The role of humor discourse in the construction of gender identity. Pragmalingüística, 27, 112-132.
Lu, J. G., Martin, A. E., Usova, A., & Galinsky, A. D. (2019). Creativity and humor across cultures: Where Aha meets Haha. In S. R. Luria, J. Baer & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Creativity and humor. Academic Press.
MacLeod, C., & McArthur, V. (2019). The construction of gender in dating apps: An interface analysis of Tinder and Bumble. Feminist Media Studies, 19(6), 822-840.
Maíz-Arévalo, C. (2013). “Just click ‘Like’”: Computer-mediated responses to Spanish compliments. Journal of Pragmatics, 51, 47-67.
Maíz-Arévalo, C. (2015). Jocular mockery in computer-mediated communication: A contrastive study of a Spanish and English Facebook community. Journal of Politeness Research, 11(2), 289-327.
Maíz-Arévalo, C. (2021a). Humour and self-presentation on WhatsApp profile status. In C. Xie, F. Yus, & H. Haberland (Eds.), Approaches to Internet pragmatics: Theory and practice (pp. 176-205). John Benjamins.
Maíz-Arévalo, C. (2021b). When humour backfires: How do WhatsApp users respond to humorous profile statuses as a self-presentation strategy? Internet Pragmatics, 4(1), 111-130.
Mann, C., & Stewart, F. (2000). Internet communication and qualitative research. Sage.
Martin, R. (2007). The psychology of humor: An integrative approach. Elsevier.
Martin, R. A., Puhlik-Doris, P., Larsen, G., Gray, J., & Weir, K. (2003). Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the Humor Styles Questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(1), 48-75.
Mendiburo, A. & Páez, D. (2011). Humor y Cultura. Correlaciones entre estilos de humor y dimensiones culturales en 14 países. Boletín de Psicología, 102, 89-105.
Mir, M., & Cots, J. M. (2019). The use of humor in Spanish and English compliment responses: A cross-cultural analysis. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 32(3), 393-416.
Newett, L., Churchill, B., & Robards, B. (2018). Forming connections in the digital era: Tinder, a new tool in young Australian intimate life. Journal of Sociology, 54(3), 346-361.
Nilsen, D., & Nilsen, A. P. (1978). Language play: an introduction to linguistics. Newbury House.
Norrick, N. R. (1989). Intertextuality in humor. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 2(2), 117-140.
Norrick, N. R. (1993). Repetition in canned jokes and spontaneous conversational joking. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 6(4), 385-402.
Norrick, N. R. (1994). Involvement and joking in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 22(3-4), 409-430.
Norrick, N. R. (2003). Issues in conversational joking. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(9), 1333-1359.
Paccagnella, L. (1997). Getting the seats of your pants dirty: A methodology for ethnographic research on virtual communities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(1).
Partington, A. (2006). The linguistics of laughter. A corpus-assisted study of laughter-talk. Routledge Studies in Linguistics.
Partington, A. (2008). From Wodehouse to the White House: A corpus-assisted study of play, fantasy and dramatic incongruity in comic writing and laughter-talk. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 4, 189-213.
Renner, K. H., & Heydasch, T. (2010). Performing humor: On the relations between self-presentation styles, gelotophobia, gelotophilia, and katagelasticism. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 52(2), 171-190.
Rosenfeld, M. J., Thomas, R. J., & Hausen, S. (2019). Disintermediating your friends: How online dating in the United States displaces other ways of meeting. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116 (36), 17753-17758.
Ruch, W. F., & Heintz, S. (2013). Humour styles, personality and psychological well-being: What’s humour got to do with it?. The European Journal of Humour Research, 1(1), 1-24.
Ruiz-Gurillo, L., & Linares-Bernabéu, E. (2020). Subversive humor in Spanish stand-up comedy. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 33(1), 29-54.
Sacks, H. (1974). An analysis of the course of a joke’s telling. Explorations in the ethnography of speaking. In R. Bauman & J. Sherzer (Eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking (pp. 337-353). Cambridge University Press.
Sánchez-Moya, A., & Cruz-Moya, O. (2015). “Hey there! I am using WhatsApp”: A preliminary study of recurrent discursive realisations in a corpus of WhatsApp statuses. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 212, 52-60.
Schegloff, E. (1986). The routine as achievement. Human Studies, 9, 111-151.
Schegloff, E., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 7, 289-327.
Shultz, T. R. (1972). The role of incongruity and resolution in children’s appreciation of cartoon humor. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 13(3), 456–477.
Shultz, T. R. (1976). A cognitive-developmental analysis of humour. In A.J. Chapman & H.C. Foot (Eds.), Humor and laughter: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 11-36). John Wiley & Sons.
Sobieraj, S., & Humphreys, L. (2022). The Tinder Games: Collective mobile dating app use and gender conforming behavior. Mobile Media & Communication, 10(1), 57-75.
Strugo, J., & Muise, A. (2019). Swiping for the right reasons: Approach and avoidance goals are associated with actual and perceived dating success on Tinder. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 28(2), 93-104.
Suls, J. M. (1972). A two-stage model for the appreciation of jokes and cartoons: An information-processing analysis. In J. H. Goldstein & P. E. McGhee (Eds.), The psychology of humor: Theoretical perspectives and empirical issues (pp. 81-100). Academic Press.
Suls, J. M. (1977). Cognitive and disparagement theories of humor: A theoretical and empirical synthesis. In A. J. Chapman & H. C. Foot (Eds.), It’s a funny thing, humour: Proceedings of the international conference on humour and laughter (pp. 41-46). Pergamon Press.
Suls, J. M. (1983). Cognitive processes in humor appreciation. In P. E. McGhee & J. H. Goldstein (Eds.), Handbook of humor research: Basic issues (Vol. 1) (pp. 39–57). Springer-Verlag.
Thompson, L. (2018). “I can be your Tinder nightmare”: Harassment and misogyny in the online sexual marketplace. Feminism & Psychology, 28(1), 69-89.
Timmermans, E., & Courtois, C. (2018). From swiping to casual sex and/or committed relationships: Exploring the experiences of Tinder users. The Information Society, 34, 59-70.
Timmermans, E., & De Caluwé, E. (2017). To Tinder or not to Tinder, that’s the question: An individual differences perspective to Tinder use and motives. Personality and Individual Differences, 110, 74-79.
Toma, C. L., & Hancock, J. T. (2011). A new twist on love’s labor: Self-presentation in online dating profiles. In K. B. Wright & L. M. Webb (Eds.), Computer-mediated Communication in Personal Relationships (pp. 41-55). Peter Lang.
Toncar, M. F. (2001). The use of humour in television advertising: Revisiting the US-UK comparison. International Journal of Advertising, 20(4), 521-539.
Townsend, L., & Wallace, C. (2016). Social media research: A guide to ethics. University of Aberdeen.
Ungar, S. (1984). Self‐mockery: An alternative form of self‐presentation. Symbolic Interaction 7(1), 121-133.
Vangelisti, A. L., & Perlman, D. (Eds.). (2018). The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Virtanen, T. (2022). Virtual performatives as face-work practices on Twitter: Relying on self-reference and humour. Journal of Pragmatics, 89, 134-146.
Wada, M., Clarke, L. H., & Mortenson, W. B. (2019). “I am busy independent woman who has sense of humor, caring about others”: Older adults’ self-representations in online dating profiles. Ageing & Society, 39(5), 951-976.
Wyers, R., & Collins, J. E. (1992). A theory of humor elicitation. Psychological Review, 99(4), 663-688.
Yang, C., & Brown, B. (2016). Online self-presentation on Facebook and self-development during the college transition. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(2), 402-416.
Yus, F. (2018). Identity-related issues in meme communication. Internet Pragmatics, 1(1), 113-133.
