In my research paper I examine the first two election campaigns in Hungary following the Astro-Hungarian Compromise (1867), in particular, the ways the campaigns employed tools of humour in popular press products of the time, such as caricatures and texts in humour magazines (Ludas Matyi [‘Mattie the Goose-Boy’], Az Üstökös [‘The Comet’], Borsszem Jankó [‘Jonny Peppercorn’]), which were considered effective political weapons by contemporaries. After a history-oriented introduction devoted to illustrating the much-debated content of the Compromise, the election system and the historical significance of the analysed papers, I categorize caricatures and the humorous or satirical texts related to the election of parliamentarians along the lines of the following aspects: (1) attacks against specific people, (2) standing up against the principles and political symbols of the opponent, (3) listing well-known, everyday anti-theses, (4) standing up against the press of the opponent, (5) judgment of the role of the Jewish, (6) war metaphors, (7) critique of the campaign methods of the opponent. My goal is to reveal what tools were used to ridicule political opponents, how parties were described to (potential) voters, how the parties tried to promote voting and convince people of their points of view. The analysed texts clearly depict the division of the Hungarian society (either supporting or rejecting the Compromise), and also document that the political tones became coarser and coarser, even in this humorous genre. During campaigns, the topic of elections took over the humour magazines, which serves as evidence for the intensity of public interest.
A Pallas nagy lexikona (1897) [The great lexicon of Pallas]. vol. 16. Budapest: Pallas.
Boros, Zs. & Szabó, D. (1999). Parlamentarizmus Magyarországon. Parlament, pártok, választások [Parliamentarism in Hungary. Parliament, parties, elections] Budapest: Korona.
Gerhard, P. (2010). ’A politika személyessége [Personalness of politics]’. Budapesti Negyed [Budapestian District] 18 (2), pp. 181-209.
http://epa.oszk.hu/00000/00003/00052/pdf/ (accessed: 02. 04. 2018.)
Gerő, A. (1997). The Hungarian Parliament (1867–1918). A Mirage of Power. New York: Atlantic Research Publications Inc.
Lutter, J. & Hickersberger, M. (2000). Wahlkampagnen aus normativer Sicht [Election campaigns from a normative perspective]. Wien: Universität Wien.
Mihályffy, Zs. (2009). Politikai kommunikáció elméletben és gyakorlatban [Political communication it theory and practice]. Budapest: L’Harmattan.
Plasser, F. (2009). ‘Political Consulting Worldwide’, in Johnson, D. W. (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Political Management. New York: Routledge, pp. 24-41.
file:///C:/Users/Tam%C3%A1s%20%C3%81gnes/Downloads/RoutledgeHandbooks-9780203892138-chapter3.pdf (accessed: 02. 04. 2018.)
Sanz, M. J. P. (2013). ‘Relevance theory and political advertising. A case study’. European Journal of Humour Research 1 (2) pp. 10-23.
https://europeanjournalofhumour.org/index.php/ejhr/article/view/Pinar%20Sanz (accessed: 02. 04. 2018.)
Sipos, B. (2011). Sajtó és hatalom a Horthy-korszakban: politika- és társadalomtörténeti vázlat [Press and power in the Horthy Era: A political and social historical sketch]. Budapest: Argumentum.
Strömbäck, J. & Kiousis, S. (2014). ‘Strategic political communication in election campaigns’, in Reinemann, C. (Hrsg.), Political Communication, Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 109-128.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263353301_Strategic_Political_Communication_in_Election_Campaigns (accessed: 02. 04. 2018.)
Toth, A. (1973). Parteien und Reichstagswahlen in Ungarn, 1848–1892 [Parties and parliamentary elections in Hungary, 1848–1892]. München: Oldenbourg Verlag.
Tsakona, V. (2013). ‘Parliamentary punning: Is the Opposition more humorous than the ruling party?’ European Journal of Humour Research 1 (2), pp. 101-111. https://europeanjournalofhumour.org/index.php/ejhr/article/view/Tsakona (accessed: 02. 04. 2018.)