Individuals differ in their appreciation of jokes and cartoons with respect to the structure of the humorous material (e.g., whether the jokes and cartoons are can be categorised in terms of incongruity-resolution or in terms of nonsense), as well as content (e.g., whether they contain sexual themes or not). While the 3WD (3 jokes dimensions) test allows for the measurement of such differences in a paper-pencil test of verbal jokes and visual cartoons, humour transported by other media, such as TV advertisements, has not been included so far. The current study aimed at assessing the appreciation of jokes and cartoons alongside the appreciation of humorous TV ads that were pre-categorized according to the structure and content factors of the 3WD. Moreover, relationships to personality and willingness to buy were also assessed. A sample of 134 adult participants completed the study. A joint factor analysis of the 3WD scores and humour appreciation in TV ads shows a five-factor structure, with three factors denominating the appreciation of incongruity-resolution humour, nonsense humour and sexual humour, a fourth factor denominating the liking of incongruity resolution humour with sexual themes (in both ads and jokes) and an advertisement specific factor. Thus, the 3WD dimensions can also be verified in humorous ads. Psychoticism and sensation seeking correlated negatively with the perceived funniness of incongruity resolution humour, replicating findings for the 3WD and additionally showing that the relationships are similar with respect to humour appreciation in TV advertisements. Moreover, the appreciation of humour predicted the willingness of the individual to buy the product or use the service. To conclude, the structure of humour appreciation is generalizable across media. Yet, there is also some advertisement specific variance and future studies may address the question of whether the 3WD covers all aspects of humour appreciation across media types. Moreover, knowing the target group of a product (and personality features of this group) may help to tailor the humour of the advertisement to match the “humour taste” of potential customers.
Alden, D., Hoyer, W., & Lee, C. (1993). ‘Identifying global and culture-specific dimensions of humor in advertising: A multinational analysis’. Journal of Marketing 57(2), pp. 64–75.
Alden, D. L., Mukherjee, A., & Hoyer, W. D. (2000). ‘The effects of incongruity, surprise and positive moderators on perceived humor in television advertising’. Journal of Advertising 29(2), pp. 1–15.
Beauducel, A., & Brocke, B. (2003). ‘Sensation Seeking Scale – Form V: Merkmale des Ver-fahrens und Bemerkungen zur deutschsprachigen Adaptation’. [Sensation Seeking Scales, Form V: Characteristics of the test and comments on the German adaptation]. In Roth, M & Hammelstein, P. (Hrsg.), Sensation Seeking – Konzeption, Diagnostik und Anwendung Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe, pp. 77–99.
Beauducel, A., Strobel, A., & Brocke, B. (2003). ‘Psychometrische Eigenschaften und Normen einer deutschsprachigen Fassung der Sensation Seeking-Skalen, Form V’ [Psychometric properties and norms of a German version of the Sensation Seeking Scales, Form V]. Diagnostica 49(2), pp. 61–72.
Beard, F. K. (2005). ‘One hundred years of humor in American advertising’. Journal of Macromarketing 25(1), pp. 54–65.
Beard, F. K. (2008). Humor in the Advertising Business: Theory, Practice, and Wit. Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield.
Berger, A. A. (1993). An Anatomy of Humor. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Buijzen, M., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2004). ’Developing a typology of humor in audiovisual media’, Media Psychology 6, pp. 147–167.
Carretero-Dios, H., & Ruch, W. (2010). ‘Humor appreciation and sensation seeking: Invariance of findings across culture and assessment instrument? ’, Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 23, pp. 427–445.
Chan, F. (2011). ‘The use of humor in television advertising in Hong Kong’, Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 24, pp. 43–61.
Chapman, A. J. (1983). ‘Humor and laughter in social interaction and some implications for humor research’, in McGhee, P.E. & Goldstein, J.H. (eds.), Handbook of humor research, NY: Springer, pp. 135–157.
Chapman, A. J., & Chapman, W. A. (1974). ‘Responsiveness to humor: Its dependency upon a companion’s humorous smiling and laughter’, Journal of Psychology 88, pp. 245–252.
Davies, C. (1998). Jokes and their Relation to Society. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
Davies, C. (2005). ‘European ethnic scripts and the translation and switching of jokes’, Humor 18, pp. 147–160.
Devereux, P. G., & Ginsburg, G. P. (2001). ‘Sociality effects on the production of laughter’. Journal of General Psychology 128, pp. 227–240.
Eisend, M. (2009). ‘A meta-analysis of humor in advertising’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 37, pp. 191–203.
Eysenck, H. J. (1942). ‘The appreciation of humour: An experimental and theoretical study’, British Journal of Psychology 32, pp. 295–309.
Eysenck, S. B. G., Eysenck, H. J., & Barrett, P. (1985). ‘A revised version of the psychoticism scale’, Personality and Individual Differences 6, pp. 21–29.
Forabosco, G., & Ruch, W. (1994). ‘Sensation seeking, social attitudes and humor appreciation in Italy’, Personality and Individual Differences 16, pp. 515–528.
Galloway, G., & Chirico, D. (2008). ‘Personality and humor appreciation: Evidence of an association between trait neuroticism and preferences for structural features of humor’, Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 21(2), pp. 129–142.
Gulas, C. S., & Weinberger, M. G. (2006). Humor in Advertising: A Comprehensive Analysis. NY: M. E. Sharpe.
Hehl, F.-J., & Ruch, W. (1985). ‘The location of sense of humor within comprehensive per-sonality spaces: An exploratory study’, Personality and Individual Differences 6, pp. 703–715.
Hofmann, J., Platt, T., Ruch, W., & Niewiadomski, R., & Urbain, J. (2015). ‘The influence of a virtual companion on amusement when watching funny films’, Motivation and Emotion 39, pp. 434–447.
Kelly, J. P., & Solomon, P. J. (1975). ‘Humor in television advertising’, Journal of Advertising 4(3), pp. 31–35.
Köhler, G., & Ruch, W. (1996). ‘Sources of variance in current sense of humor inventories: How much substance, how much method variance? ’ Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 9, pp. 363–397.
Lee, Y. H., & Lim, E. A. C. (2008). ‘What’s funny and what’s not: The moderating role of cultural orientation in ad humor’, Journal of Advertising 37(2), pp. 71–84.
Martin, R. A. (2007). The Psychology of Humor: An Integrative Approach. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press.
McGhee, P. E., Ruch, W., & Hehl, F.-J. (1990). ‘A personality-based model of humor development during adulthood’, Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 3, pp. 119–146.
Newton, J. D., Wong, J., & Newton, F. J. (2016). ‘Listerine—For the bridesmaid who’s never a bride: Disparaging humour increases brand attitude and recall among the powerless’, European Journal of Marketing 50, pp. 1137–1158.
Platow, M. J., Haslam, S. A., Both, A., Chew, I., Cuddon, M., Goharpey, N., Maurer, J., Rosini, S., Tsekouras, A., & Grace, D. M. (2005). ‘“It’s not funny if they’re laughing”: Self-categorization, social influence, and responses to canned laughter’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 41, pp. 542–550.
Ruch, W. (1981). ‘Witzbeurteilung und Persönlichkeit: Eine trimodale Analyse’ [Humour appreciation and personaliy: A three mode analysis], Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie 2, pp. 253–273.
Ruch, W. (1988). ‘Sensation seeking and the enjoyment of structure and content of humor: Stability of findings across four samples’, Personality and Individual Differences 9, pp. 861–871.
Ruch, W. (1992). ‘Assessment of appreciation of humor: Studies with the 3WD humor test’, in Spielberger, C.D. & Butcher, J.N. (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment. Vol. 9, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 27–75.
Ruch, W. (1995). ‘Will the real relationship between facial expression and affective experience please stand up: The case of exhilaration’, in Ekman, P. & Rosenberg, E.L. (eds.), What the face reveals: Basic and applied studies of spontaneous expression using the Facial Action Coding System (FACS), NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 89–111.
Ruch, W. (1999). ‘Die revidierte Fassung des Eysenck Personality Questionnaire und die Konstruktion des deutschen EPQ-R bzw. EPQ-RK’ [The Eysenck Personality Questionnaire—Revised and the construction of the German standard and short versions (EPQ-R and EPQ-RK)], Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie 20, pp. 1–24.
Ruch, W. (2007). ‘Foreword and overview. Sense of humor: A new look at an old concept’, in Ruch, W (ed.), The sense of humor: Explorations of a personality characteristic, Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 3–14.
Ruch, W. (2008). ‘The psychology of humor’, in Raskin, V. (ed.), The primer in humor research, Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 17–100.
Ruch, W., & Hehl, F.-J. (1985). ‘Diagnose des Humors – Humor als Diagnostikum’ [Assessment of humor – humor as an assessment tool], in Hehl, F.-J., Ebel, V. & Ruch, W. (Hrsg.), Diagnostik psychischer und psychophysiologischer Störungen, Bonn, Germany: Deutscher Psychologen Verlag, pp. 253–325.
Ruch, W., Hehl, F.-J., & McGhee, P. E. (1990). ‘Age differences in the enjoyment of incon-gruity-resolution and nonsense humor during adulthood’, Psychology and Aging 5, pp. 348–355.
Ruch, W., & Malcherek, J. (2009). ‘Sensation seeking, general aesthetic preferences, and humor appreciation as predictors of liking of the grotesque’, Journal of Literary Theory 3, pp. 333–351.
Samson, A. C., Hempelmann, C. F., Huber, O., & Zysset, S. (2009). ‘Neural substrates of incongruity-resolution and nonsense humor’, Neuropsychologia 47(4), pp. 1023–1033.
Schwarz, U., Hoffman, S., & Hutter, K. (2015). ‘Do men and women laugh about different types of humor? A comparison of satire, sentimental comedy, and comic wit in print ad’s, Journal of Contemporary Issues & Research in Advertising 36 (1), pp. 70–87.
Speck, P. S. (1991). ‘The humorous message taxonomy: A framework for the study of humorous ads, Current Issues and Research in Advertising 13, pp. 1–44.
Suls, J. (1972). ‘A two-stage model for the appreciation of jokes and cartoons: An informa-tion-processing analysis’, in Goldstein, J.H. & McGhee, P.E. (eds.), The psychology of humor: Theoretical perspectives and empirical issues, NY: Academic Press, pp. 81–100.
Weinberger, M. G., & Gulas, C. S. (1992). ‘The impact of humor in advertising: A review’, Journal of Advertising 21, pp. 35–59.
Weinberger, M. G., Gulas, C. S., & Weinberger, M. F. (2015). ‘Looking in through outdoor: A socio-cultural and historical perspective on the evolution of advertising humor’, International Journal of Advertising: The Review of Marketing Communications 34(3), pp. 447–472.
Weinberger, M. G., Spotts, H., Campbell, L., & Parsons, A. L. (1995). ‘The use and effect of humor in different advertising media’, Journal of Advertising Research 35, pp. 44–56.
Zuckerman, M. (1979). Sensation seeking: beyond the optimal level of arousal. Hillsdale, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Zuckerman, M. (1994). Behavioral expressions and biosocial bases of sensation seeking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Litle, P., & Zuckerman, M. (1986). ‘Sensation seeking and music preferences’, Personality and Individual Differences 7(4), pp. 575–578.