The European Journal of Humour Research

Vol 8, No 3 (2020)

Humour and intertextuality in Steve Bell’s political cartoons

Maria Jesús Pinar


The aim of this paper is to analyse 12 political cartoons published by Steve Bell in the left-wing oriented newspaper The Guardian to show how visual metaphors and metonymies and intertextual references are powerful strategies to present potent rhetorical depictions of political candidates and political issues. These devices are used to establish intertextual links across political cartoons and historical events, contemporary culture, paintings, literary works and illustrations. The themes that appear regularly in political cartoons have been identified, as well as a number of categories of source domains in visual metaphors. The analysis of the cartoons reveals that the interpretation of the cartoon and the appreciation of humour depend on the audience’s access to background knowledge, both of the political situation described in the cartoon and the intertextual references presented, on the audience’s ideology and on the decoding of the characteristics mapped onto the target of the metaphor.



Agüero Guerra, M. (2016). ‘Beyond verbal incongruity: A genre-specific model for the interpretation of humour in political cartoons’, in Ruiz-Gurillo, L. (ed.), Metapragmatics of Humour: Current Research Trends, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 57-77.

Bakhtin, M. M. (1973). Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. Ann Arbor: Ardis.

Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). ‘Discourse in the novel’, in Holquist, M. (ed.), The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M. M. Bakhtin. Austin: University of Texas Press, pp. 259-422.

Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech Genre and Other Late Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.

Bell, S. (2017). ‘Steve Bell on his best cartoons of 2017 – “Corbyn bears a strong resemblance to Poopdeck Pappy”’. Retrieved May 18, 2019 from

Bell, S. (2017). ‘Steve Bell: drawing dissent’. saturday/audio/201836267/steve-bell-drawing-dissent.

Browne, R. (1972). ‘Popular culture: Notes towards a definition’, in Browne, R. & Ronald J. A. (eds.), Popular Culture and Curricula, Bowling Green, OH: Bowling Green State University Press, pp. 3-11.

Burack, J. (1994). Understanding and Creating Editorial Cartoons: A Resource Guide. Madison: Knowledge Unlimited.

Caple, H. (2008). ‘Intermodal relations in image-nuclear news stories’, in Unsworth, L. (ed.), Multimodal Semiotics: Functional Analysis in Contexts of Education, London: Continuum, pp. 125-138.

Caple, H. (2010). ‘Doubling-up: Allusion and bonding in multi-semiotic news stories’, in Bednarek, M. & Martin. J. R. (eds.), New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity, and Affiliation, London: Continuum, pp. 111-133.

Cochrane, L. (2013). ‘The Margaret Thatcher look: From the pearls to the handbag’. Retrieved May 18, 2019 from

Cody, N. (2016). ‘The Berlin Olympics: Sports, anti-semitism, and propaganda in Nazi Germany’. Student Publications 434. Retrieved December 18, 2019 from

Conradie, M. (2012). ‘Anonymous vs. acknowledged intertexts: A relevance theoretic approach to intertextuality in print advertising’. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 30 (3), pp. 293-310.

Crook, J. (2004). ‘On covert communication in advertising’. Journal of Pragmatics 36 (4), pp. 715-738.

Delaney, T. (2007). ‘Pop culture: An overview’. Retrieved May 18, 2019 from

DeSousa, M. A. & Medhurst, M. J. (1982). ‘The editorial cartoon as visual rhetoric: Rethinking Boss Tweed’. Journal of Visual/Verbal Languaging 2 (2), pp. 43-52.

Diamond, M. (2002). ‘No laughing matter: Post-September 11 political cartoons in Arab/Muslim newspapers’. Political Communication 19, pp. 251-272.

El Refaie, E. (2003). ‘Understanding visual metaphor: The example of newspaper cartoons’. Visual Communication 2 (1), pp. 75-96.

El Refaie, E. (2009). ‘Metaphor in political cartoons: Exploring audience responses’, in Forceville, C. & Urios-Aparisi, E. (eds.), Multimodal Metaphor, Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 173-196.

Forceville, C. (1996). Pictorial Metaphor in Advertising. London: Routledge.

Forceville, C. (2013). ‘The strategic use of the visual mode in advertising metaphors’, in E. Djonov & S. Zhao (eds.), Critical Multimodal Studies of Popular Culture, New York: Routledge, pp. 55-70.

Forceville, C. & van de Laar, N. (2019). ‘Metaphors portraying right-wing politician Geert Wilders in Dutch political cartoons’, in Hidalgo-Tenorio, E., Benítez-Castro, M.-Á. & De Cesare, F. (eds.), Populist Discourse: Critical Approaches to Contemporary Politics, London: Routledge, pp. 292-307.

Gombrich, E. H. (1963). ‘The cartoonist’s armoury’, in Meditations on a Hobby Horse and Other Essays on the Theory of Art. London: Phaidon, pp. 127-142.

Harvey, J. (1994). ‘Stiletto in the Ink: British Political Cartoons’, CSCC Archive, p.14.

Hitchon, J. C. & Jura, J. O. (1997). ‘Allegorically speaking: Intertextuality of the postmodern culture and its impact on print and television advertising’. Communication Studies 48 (2), pp. 142-158.

Irwin, W. (2001). ‘What is an allusion?’. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 59 (3), pp. 287-297.

Jewitt, C., Bezemer, J. & O’Halloran, K. (2016). Introducing Multimodality. London: Routledge.

Kuipers, G. (2009). ‘Humour styles and symbolic boundaries’. Journal of Literary Theory 3 (2), pp. 219-240.

Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lennon, P. (2004). Allusions in the Press. An Applied Linguistics Study. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Moya-Guijarro, A. J. (2016). ‘Semiotic metaphor in three children’s picture books’. Atlantis. Journal of the Spanish Association of Anglo-American Studies 38 (1), pp. 33-52.

O’Brien, L. (2018). ‘The European spirit on (dead) horseback?’. Retrieved June 8, 2019 from

Pinar-Sanz, M. J. (2008). ‘Decoding meaning in political cartoons’, in Jones, C. & Ventola, E. (eds.), From Language to Multisemiotics, London: Equinox, pp. 313-332.

Pinar-Sanz, M. J. (2012). ‘Ethnic humour and political advertising’, in Chovanec, J. & Ermida, I. (eds.), Language and Humour in the Media, Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars, pp. 211-230.

Pinar-Sanz, M. J. (2018). ‘Offence strategies in political cartoons’, in Crespo-Fernández, E. (ed.), Taboo in Discourse: Studies on Attenuation and Offence in Communication, Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 127-150.

Ridanpää, J. (2009). ‘Geopolitics of humour: The Muhammed cartoon crisis and the kaltio comic strip episode in Finland’. Geopolitics 14 (4), pp. 729-749.

Schubart, R. (2007). Super Bitches and Action Babes: The Females Hero in Popular Cinema, 1970-2006. Jefferson: McFarland.

Seymour-Ure, C. (2001). ‘What future for the British political cartoon?’ Journalism Studies 2 (3), pp. 333-355.

Slattery, J. (2010). ‘Steve Bell: “Why I put Cameron in condom”’. Retrieved June 8, 2019 from condom.html.

Sook, A. ‘The Discobolus: Greeks, Nazis and the body beautiful’. Retrieved June 8, 2019 from

Taylor, D. F. (2018). The Politics of Parody. A Literary History of Caricature, 1760-1830. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Tsakona, V. (2009). ‘Language and image interaction in cartoons: Towards a multimodal theory of humour’. Journal of Pragmatics 41 (6), pp. 1171-1188.

Tsakona, V. (2018). ‘Intertextuality and/in political jokes’. Lingua 203, pp. 1-15.

Vetustideces (2017). ‘CLIPDA CCI: Humour al arte de marzo’. Retrieved May 15, 2019 from

Werner, W. (2004). ‘On political cartoons and social studies textbooks: Visual analogies, intertextuality, and cultural memory’. Canadian Social Studies 38 (2). Retrieved June 12, 2020 from

Wilson, D. & Sperber, D. (2004). ‘Relevance theory’, in Horn, L. R. & Ward, G. (eds.), The Handbook of Pragmatics, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 45-76.

Yus, F. (2003). ‘Humour and the search for relevance’. Journal of Pragmatics 35 (9), pp. 1295-1331.

Yus, F. (2016). ‘Multimodal humour: The case of cartoons in the press’, in Yus, F. (ed.), Humour and Relevance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 267-298.