The European Journal of Humour Research

Vol 8, No 3 (2020)

Intertextuality and failed taboo humour in advertising

Margherita Dore


Humour is often exploited in advertising to enhance the positive image of a brand or corporate company, as well as to promote products or services. Advertisers seek the involvement of the audience via covert or overt references that, in their opinion, may trigger humour and, hypothetically, result in a positive customer response. However, using intertextual humour in advertising can sometimes be risky because, even though the ideal interlocutor is supposed to be familiar with the humorous reference the author alludes to, the latter can never be certain of whether it will be favourably received. The matter is further complicated if the advert relies on references that play on taboo or transgressive topics, which some may find humorous while others will consider distasteful. After all, humour is a phenomenon that varies according to individual cultures and historical time, as well as in terms of how it is perceived and whether it is appreciated. In this context, this study focuses on the use of intertextual taboo humour in adverts and campaigns that exploit both verbal and non-verbal texts. It particularly explores the reasons for the target clientele’s reaction, which has had a boomerang effect on the brand and company itself. The suggested hypothesis is that the simultaneous exploitation of verbal and non-verbal intertextual references (consciously or unconsciously) activates multiple targets and scripts that cause the intended humour to fail in its scope.



Allen, G. (2000). Intertextuality. London: Routledge.

Attardo, S. (2001). Humorous Texts: A Semantic and Pragmatic Analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Attardo, S. (1997). ‘The semantic foundations of cognitive theories of humour’. Humour: International Journal of Humour Research 7 (1), pp. 395–420.

Attardo, S. (1994). Linguistic Theories of Humour. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Bakhtin, M. M. & Volosinov V. N. (1986). Marxism and the Philosophy of Language (translated by L. Matejka & I. R. Titunik). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Barr, S. (2018). ‘Beer masts given to University of Sussex freshers condemned as “sexist”’, The Independent, 29.9. Retrieved March 29, 2020 from

Beard, F. K. (2008). ‘Advertising and audience offense: The role of intentional humour’. Journal of Marketing Communications 14 (1), pp. 1–17.

Bell, N. (2015). We Are Not Amused: Failed Humour in Interaction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Berger, A. A. (2015 [2000]). Ads, Fads, and Consumer Culture. Advertising’s Impact on American Character and Society, 5th ed. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

Berger, J., Sorensen, A. T. & Rasmussen, S. J. (2010). ‘Positive effects of negative publicity: When negative reviews increase sales’. Marketing Science 29 (5), pp. 815–827.

Bernstein, D. (1974). Creative Advertising. London, Longman.

Biswas, A., Olsen, J. E. & Carlet, V. (1992). ‘A comparison of print advertisements from the United States and France’. Journal of Advertising 21 (4), pp. 73–81.

Boxman-Shabtai, L. & Shifman, L. (2014). ‘Evasive targets: Deciphering polysemy in mediated humour’. Journal of Communication 64 (5), pp. 977–988.

Catanescu, C. & Tom, G. (2001). ‘Types of humour in television and magazine advertising’. Review of Business 22 (1), pp. 92–96.

Chovanec, J. & Tsakona, V. (2018). ‘Investigating the dynamics of humour’, in Tsakona, V. & Chovanec, J. (eds.), Creating and Negotiating Humour in Everyday Interactions, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 1–26.

Dore, M. (2010). ‘Manipulation of humorous culture-specific allusions in AVT’. In Harding, S.-A. & Elimam, A. (eds.), CTIS Occasional Papers 4, Manchester: University of Manchester, pp. 5–28.

Dore, M. (2018). ‘Controversial humour in advertising: Social and cultural implications’ in Maon, F., Lindgreen, A., Vanhamme, J., Angell, R. J. & Memery, J. (eds.), Not All Claps and Cheers: Humour in Business and Society Relationships, London: Routledge, pp. 132–145.

Dore, M. (2019). Humour in Audiovisual Translation. Theories and Applications. London: Routledge.

Ermida, I. (2008). The Language of Comic Narratives: Humour Construction in Short Stories. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Flaherty, K. E., Weinberger, M. G. & Gulas, C. S. (2004). ‘The impact of perceived humour, product type, and humour style in radio advertising’. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising 26 (1), pp. 25–36.

Forceville, C. (2007). ‘Mutlimodal metaphor in ten Dutch TV commercials’. The Public Journal of Semiotics 1 (1), pp. 15–34.

Freitas, E. S. L. (2008). Taboo in Advertising. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Freitas, E. S. L. (2016). ‘Crude and taboo humour in television advertising: An analysis of commercials for consumer goods’, in Bucaria, C. & Barra, L. (eds.), Taboo Comedy, Television and Controversial Humour, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 173–190.

Fuentes-Luque, A. & Valdés, C. (forthcoming). ‘Selling our souls for a laugh: Translated humour in advertising’, in Dore, M. (ed.), Humour Translation in the Age of Multimedia, New York: Routledge.

Gérin, A. (2013). ‘A second look at laughter: Humour in visual arts’. Humour: International Journal of Humour Research 26 (1), pp. 155–176.

Gulas, C. S. & Weinberger, M. G. (2006). Humour in Advertising: A Comprehensive Analysis. New York: M. E. Sharpe.

Hale, A. (2018). ‘There is an after-life (for jokes, anyway): The potential for, and appeal of, “immortality” in humour’. Humour: International Journal of Humour Research 31(3), pp. 507–538.

Hatzithomas, L., Boutsouki, C. & Zotos, Y. (2016). ‘The role of economic conditions on humour generation and attitude towards humorous TV commercials’. Humour: International Journal of Humour Research 29 (4), pp. 483–505.

Hempelmann, C. & Miller, T. (2017). ‘Puns: Taxonomies and phonology’, in: Attardo, S. (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Language and Humour, London: Routledge, pp. 95–108.

Hill, J. H. (2005). ‘Intertextuality as source and evidence for indirect indexical meanings’. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15 (1), pp. 113–124.

Hlynka, A., Knupfer, N. N. (1997). ‘A thinking person’s comedy: A study of intertextuality in “Cheers”’, in Griffin, R. E., Hunter, J. M., Schiffman, C. B., Gibbs, W. J. (eds.), Proceedings of VisionQuest: Journeys toward Visual Literacy. Selected Readings from the Annual Conference of the International Visual Literacy Association (28th, Cheyenne, Wyoming, October, 1996), pp. 401–410.

Kristeva, J. (1980). Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art (translated by L.S. Roudiez). Oxford: Blackwell.

Kuipers, G. (2009). ‘Humour styles and symbolic boundaries’. Journal of Literary Theory 3 (2), pp. 219–240.

Laineste, L. & Voolaid, P. (2016). ‘Laughing across borders: Intertextuality of internet memes’. The European Journal of Humour Research 4 (4), pp. 26–49.

MacInnis, D. J., Moorman, C. & Jaworski, B. J. (1991). ‘Enhancing and measuring consumers’ motivation, opportunity, and ability to process brand information from ads’. Journal of Marketing 55 (4), pp. 32–53.

Manteli, V. (2011). ‘Humour and… Stalin in a National Theatre of Greece postmodern production’, in Tsakona, V. & Popa, D. E. (eds.), Studies in Political Humour: In Between Political Critique and Public Entertainment, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 243–270.

Miller, R. J. (2009). ‘Critics cringe at ad for Burger King’s latest sandwich’. Fox News, 30.6. Retrieved April, 13, 2020 from

Montgomery, M., Durant, A., Fabb, N., Furniss, T. & Mills, S. (2007). Ways of Reading. 3rd ed. London: Routledge.

Norrick, N. R. (1989). ‘Intertextuality in humour’. Humour: International Journal of Humour Research 2 (2), pp. 117–139.

Norrick, N. R. (1993). Conversational Joking: Humour in Everyday Talk. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Raskin, V. (1985). Semantic Mechanisms of Humour. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

Reuters (2008). ‘Absolut vodka pulls ad showing California in Mexico’. 08.04. Retrieved April 24, 2020 from

Sabri, O. (2012). ‘Taboo advertising: Can humour help to attract attention and enhance recall?’ Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 20 (4), pp. 407–422.

Saussure, F. de (1974). Course in General Linguistics. London: Fontana.

Simpson, P., Mayr, A. & Statham, S. (2019). Language and Power: A Resource Book for Students, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.

Speck, P. S. (1991). ‘The humorous message taxonomy: A framework for the study of humorous ads’. Current Issues & Research in Advertising 13 (1), pp. 1–44.

Stack, L. (2018). ‘H&M Apologizes for ‘Monkey’ Image Featuring Black Child’. The New York Times 08/01. Retrieved April 19, 2020 from

Tsakona, V. (2009). ‘Language and image interaction in cartoons: Towards a multimodal theory of humour’. Journal of Pragmatics 41, pp. 1171–1188.

Tsakona, V. (2018). ‘Intertextuality and/in political jokes’. Lingua 203, pp. 1–15.

Werner, W. (2004). ‘On political cartoons and social studies textbooks: visual analogies, intertextuality, and cultural memory’. Canadian Social Studies 38 (2). Retrieved April 19, 2020 from

Zhang, M. M. (2018). ‘Dolce & Gabbana’s cancelled chopsticks advert shows us orientalism is finally being taken seriously as a form of racism’. Independent 24/11. Retrieved April 26, 2020 from