Dark humour, i.e. humour engaging with sinister or distressing topics, is often at the centre of complex legal cases regarding freedom of expression and its limits. On the one hand, this type of humour is safeguarded in principle by international free speech standards, which should also apply to expressions that “offend, shock or disturb the State or any sector of the population” (as emphasised by the European Court of Human Rights in Handyside v. United Kingdom). On the other hand, jokes about terrorism, natural disasters or other highly sensitive subjects are frequently taken to court under charges such as incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence. Even within the same judicial system, the courts’ approach to these cases is often unpredictable, and would arguably benefit from a more nuanced perspective on dark humour as a form of expression. While acknowledging the inherently subjective nature of humour interpretation, this article proposes an indicative distinction between three basic genres of dark humour, or three potential outcomes of the interpretive process—namely ‘disparaging’, ‘sarcastic’, and ‘taboo-breaking’ dark humour. This theoretical framework is subsequently illustrated through the analysis of relevant legal cases from different jurisdictions, including the European Court of Human Rights and domestic courts from Spain, Italy, Belgium, Scotland and Canada. In conclusion, moving beyond the specific case of dark humour, this article outlines the potential benefits of a closer dialogue between humour research and judicial practice.
Adriaensen, B., Bricker, A., Godioli, A., & Laros, T. (Eds.) (2022). Humor and the law: The difficulty of judging jests. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, special issue, 35(3).
Aidi, L. (2021). Muslim stand-up comedy in the US and the UK: Incongruity, everydayness, and performativity. Religions, 12(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12100801
Alkiviadou, N. (2025). Hate speech and the European Court of Human Rights. Routledge.
Baldick, C. (2001). The concise Oxford Dictionary of literary terms. Oxford University Press.
Breton, A. (1997 [1940]). Anthology of black humor. Translated by Mark Polizzotti. City Lights.
Capelotti, J.P. (2024). Leo Lins’ stand-up comedy routines: Between censorship and hate speech. The European Journal of Humour Research, 12(3), 110-125. https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR.2024.12.3.982
Carpio, G. (2008). Laughing fit to kill: Black humor in the fictions of slavery. Oxford University Press.
Chovanec, J. (2019). Early Titanic jokes: A disaster for the theory of disaster jokes? Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 32(2), 201-225.
Coming Out and Sphere Foundation (2024). Report on the life of LGBTQ+ people in Russia in 2024. Retrieved August 16, 2025, from https://comingoutspb.org/en/books/report-on-the-life-of-lgbtq-people-in-russia-in-2024/
Dangermond, K., Weewer, R., Duyndam, J., & Machielse, A. (2022). “If it stops, then I’ll start worrying.” Humor as part of the fire service culture, specifically as part of coping with critical incidents. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 35(1), 31-50. https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2021-0106
De Naeyer, B. (2025). ‘Just for laughs’ or ‘irony poisoning’? Humor vs. hate in the Schild & Vrienden appeal. ForHum: Forum for Humor and the Law, August 12. Retrieved August 16, 2025, from https://www.forhum.org/blog/just-for-laughs/
De Quincey, T. (2006). On murder, ed. Robert Morrison. Oxford University Press.
Dewey, C. (2016). How Bernie Sanders became the lord of ‘dank memes’. The Washington Post, February 23. Retrieved August 16, 2025, from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2016/02/23/how-bernie-sanders-became-the-lord-of-dank-memes/
Durani, T. (2025). In defence of digital satire: Context, audience, and Article 10 in Yevstifeyev v. Russia. Völkerrechtsblog, 17 July. Retrieved August 16, 2025, from https://voelkerrechtsblog.org/in-defence-of-digital-satire/
Fielitz, M., & Thurston, N. (Eds.) (2019). Post-digital cultures of the far right. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag.
Ford, T., & Olah, A. (2021). Disparagement humor and prejudice: Advances in theory and research. In M. Strick & T. Ford (Eds.), The social psychology of humor. Routledge.
ForHum (2025). Legal database. Retrieved August 16, 2025 from https://www.forhum.org/webapp/legaldb/
Frow, J. (2015). Genre. 2nd Edition. Routledge.
Godioli, A., Jacques, S., Young, J., & Matamoros Fernandez, A. (2025). What’s in a joke? Assessing humor in free speech jurisprudence. Forum for Humor and the Law / Columbia Global Freedom of Expression. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15383543
Godioli, A., & Young, J. (2025). Humour and the meaning of ‘context’: Interdisciplinary perspectives on ECtHR jurisprudence. Strasbourg Observers, 18 July. Retrieved August 16, 2025 from https://strasbourgobservers.com/2025/07/18/humour-and-the-meaning-of-context-interdisciplinary-perspectives-on-ecthr-jurisprudence/
Godioli, A. (2024). Joking against humanity? Dark humor and (de)familiarization. In N. Bayraktar & A. Godioli (Eds.), E(n)stranged: Rethinking defamiliarization in literature and visual culture. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60859-9_6
Godioli, A., & Young, J. (2023). Humor and free speech: A comparative analysis of global case law. Columbia Global Freedom of Expression, Special Collection. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8105760
Godioli, A., Young, J., & Fiori, B.M. (2022). Laughing matters: Humor, free speech and hate speech at the European Court of Human Rights. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 35, 2241-2265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-022-09949-8
Godioli, A., & Little, L. (2022). Different systems, similar challenges: humor and free speech in the United States and Europe. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 35(3), 305-327. https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2021-0121
Gournelos, T., & Greene, V. (Eds.) (2011). A decade of dark humor: How comedy, irony, and satire shaped post-9/11 America. University of Mississippi.
Graham, N. (2020). Laughing with “horrible” people: Reaffirming ethical boundaries through laughter. In Benko, S.A. (Ed.), Ethics in comedy: Essays on crossing the line (pp. 210-222). McFarland.
Heinze, E. (2016). Hate Speech and Democratic Citizenship. Oxford University Press.
Henman, L. (2001). Humor as a coping mechanism: Lessons from POWs. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 14(1), 83-94. https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.14.1.83
Higson-Bliss, L. (2025). Legislative Comment: The Online Safety Act 2023 and the sending of threatening or false communications. Statute Law Review, 46(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmaf021
Hodson, G., Rush, J., & Macinnis, C. (2010). A joke is just a joke (except when it isn’t): Cavalier humor beliefs facilitate the expression of group dominance motives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(4), 660-682. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019627
Holm, N. (2024). Deadpan humour, the comic disposition and the interpretation of ironic ambiguity online. New Media & Society, 26(1), 253-270. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211054011
Holm, N. (2022). No more jokes: Comic complexity, Adult Swim and a political aesthetic model of humour. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 25(2), 355-372. https://doi.org/10.1177/13675494221087296
Kuipers, G. (2005). “Where was King Kong when we needed him?” Public discourse, digital disaster jokes and the functions of laughter after 9/11. Journal of American Culture, 28(1), 70-84.
Lepoutre, M.C. (2019). Can ‘more speech’ counter ignorant speech? Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v16i3.682
Little, L.E. (2019). Guilty pleasures: Comedy and law in America. Oxford University Press.
Lyall, C., Meagher, L., & Bruce, A. (2014). A rose by any other name? Transdisciplinarity in the context of UK research policy. Futures, 65, 150-162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.08.009
May, R., & Feldman, M. (2019). Understanding the alt-right: Ideologues, ‘lulz’ and hiding in plain sight. In M. Fielitz & N. Thurston (Eds.), Post-Digital Cultures of the Far Right: Online Actions and Offline Consequences in Europe and the US (pp. 25-36). transcript Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839446706-002
Mchangama, J. (2022). Free speech: A history from Socrates to social media. Hachette.
Memepedia (2025). Охота на геев (пародия). Retrieved August 16, 2025 from https://vk.com/video-129786843_456239622?to=L3ZpZGVvLTEyOTc4Njg0M180NTYyMzk2MjI/
Mindess, H., Miller, C., Turek, J., Bender, A., & Corbin, S. (1985). The Antioch sense of humour test: Making sense of humour. Avon Books.
Morton, L.W., Eigenbrode, S.D., & Martin, T.A. (2015). Architectures of adaptive integration in large collaborative projects. Ecology and Society, 20(4). http://www.jstor.org/stable/26270306
Nilan, P. (2021). Young people and the far right. Palgrave Macmillan.
Nugraha, I.Y. (2021). ‘It’s just a prank, bro!’ ZB v. France and a dark humour that turned sour. Strasbourg Observers, October 12. Retrieved August 16, 2025 from https://strasbourgobservers.com/2021/10/12/its-just-a-prank-bro-zb-v-france-and-a-dark-humour-that-turned-sour/
Oxford Dictionaries. (2016). Black humour. Retrieved August 16, 2025 from http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/de/definition/englisch_usa/black-humour.
Pérez, R. (2022). The souls of white jokes: How racist humor fuels white supremacy. Stanford University Press.
Phillips, W., & Milner, R. (2017). The ambivalent internet: Mischief, oddity, and antagonism online. Wiley.
Polizzotti, M. (1997). Laughter in the dark. In Breton, A. (1997), pp. ix-xvii.
Raskin, V. (2017). Script-based semantic and ontological semantic theories of humor. In S. Attardo (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and humor (pp. 109-125). Routledge.
Ricci, L. (2024) La ridicolizzazione di Auschwitz sullo sfondo di una manifestazione neofascista. Giurisprudenza Italiana, 176(5), 1143-1148.
Schmid, U.K. (2023). Humorous hate speech on social media: A mixed-methods investigation of users’ perceptions and processing of hateful memes. New Media & Society, 27(3), 1588-1606. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231198169
Schmid, U.K., Schulze, H., & Drexel, A. (2024). Memes, humor, and the far right’s strategic mainstreaming. Information, Communication & Society, 28(4), 537-556. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2024.2329610
Scottish Legal News (2018). Man who uploaded ‘grossly offensive’ Nazi salute video avoids custodial sentence. Scottish Legal News, April 23. Retrieved August 16, 2025 from https://www.scottishlegal.com/articles/man-uploaded-grossly-offensive-nazi-salute-video-avoids-custodial-sentence
Simpson, P. (2003). On the discourse of satire. John Benjamins.
Swift, J. (2012). A modest proposal and other satirical works. Dover.
Taylor, J. (2019). Laughter, literature, violence, 1840–1930. Palgrave Macmillan.
Tsakona, V. (2020). Recontextualizing humor. De Gruyter.
Tzouva, P. (2022). Cancer made me a shallower person: A minoritarian story in comics. Frontiers of Narrative Studies, 8(2), 158-179. https://doi.org/10.1515/fns-2022-2019.
Urban Dictionary (2017). Dank memes. Retrieved August 16, 2025 from https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Dank+Memes
Weaver, S. (2011). Liquid racism and the ambiguity of Ali G. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 14(3), 249-264. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549410396004.
Weston Vauclair, J., & Vauclair, D. (2016). De Charlie Hebdo à #Charlie: Enjeux, histoire, perspectives. Eyrolles.
Willinger, U., Hergovich, A., Schmoeger, M., Deckert, M., Stoettner, S., Bunda, I., Witting, A., Seidler, M., Moser, R., Kacena, S., Jaeckle, D., Loader, B., Mueller, C., & Auff, E. (2017). Cognitive and emotional demands of black humour processing: The role of intelligence, aggressiveness and mood. Cognitive Processing, 18, 159-167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-016-0789-y.
Zijp, D. (2024). Comic innocence. European Journal of Humour Research, 12(1), 116-134. https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR.2024.12.1.837
