In the vernacular ideology of humour there are definite ideas about where the limits of joke acceptability lie. In practice, many joke performances seem to go beyond those limits and yet arouse little if any opposition. This paper considers the role that limits play in humour through case studies of two successful practical joke performances. I argue that the performance and appreciation of jokes consists in the playful transgression of limits, but not just those that happen to be contentious in a particular socio-political moment. Even in an apparently innocuous and widely supported joke there are indications of hypothetical disagreement that index awareness of transgression. The acceptability of specific jokes is socially constructed in very context-specific ways that transmute limits without obliterating them. The reception of practical jokes suggests that awareness of limits is ever-present, even in jokes that are completely successful.
Billig, M. (2001). ‘Humour and hatred: The racist jokes of the Ku Klux Klan’. Discourse & Society 12 (3), pp. 267-289.
Billig, M. (2005). Laughter and Ridicule: Towards a Social Critique of Humour. London: Sage.
Bowman, J.R. (1982). ‘On getting even: Notes on the organization of practical jokes’, in Loy, J. (ed.), The Paradoxes of Play: Proceedings of the Sixth Annual meeting of the Association for the Anthropological Study of Play, West Point, NY: Leisure Press, pp. 65-75.
Chafe, W. (2007). The Importance of Not Being Earnest: The Feeling behind Laughter and Humour. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Darling, S. (2004). ‘Hatching revenge’. The Press, 28 October, p. 2.
Fine, G.A. (1984). ‘Humorous interaction and the social construction of meaning: Making sense in a jocular vein’. Studies in Symbolic Interaction 5, pp. 83-101.
Fine, G.A. (1988). ‘Letting off steam? Redefining a restaurant’s work environment’, in Jones, M. O., Moore, M. D. & Snyder, R. C. (eds.), Inside Organizations: Understanding the Human Dimension, Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 119-127.
Fine, G.A. & De Soucey, M. (2005). ‘Joking cultures: humour themes as social regulation in group life’. Humour 18 (1), pp. 1-22.
Fine, G.A. & Wood, C. (2010). ‘Accounting for jokes: Jocular performance in a critical age’. Western Folklore 69 (3-4), pp. 299-321.
Fry, W. F. (1968) Sweet Madness: A Study of Humour. Palo Alto: Pacific Books.
Grady, D. (1997). ‘Maintenance man who left a big imprint’. Nelson Mail, 12 August.
Greenhill, P. (1989). ‘Welcome and unwelcome visitors: Shivarees and the political economy of rural-urban interactions in southern Ontario’. Journal of Ritual Studies 3, pp. 45-67.
Greenhill, P. (2010). Make the Night Hideous: Four English-Canadian Charivaris, 1881-1940. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Hay, J. (2001). ‘The pragmatics of humour support’. Humour 14 (1), pp. 55-82.
Holmes, J. & Marra, M. (2002). ‘Having a laugh at work: How humour contributes to workplace culture’. Journal of Pragmatics 34, pp. 1683-1710.
Kramer, E. (2011). ‘The playful is political: The metapragmatics of internet rape-joke arguments’. Language in Society 40 (2), pp. 137-168.
Kuipers, G. (2006). Good Humour, Bad Taste: A Sociology of the Joke. Berlin: De Gruyter.
La Fave, L., Haddad, J. & Maesen, W.A. (1976). ‘Superiority, enhanced self-esteem, and perceived incongruity humour theory’, in Chapman, A. J. & Foot, H. C. (eds.), Humour and Laughter: Theory, Research and Applications, New York: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 63-91.
Labov, W. & Waletzky, J. (1967). ‘Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience’. Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts, pp. 12–44.
Lewis, P. (ed.) (1997). ‘Humour and political correctness’. Humour 10 (4), pp. 453-513.
Lockyer, S. & Pickering, M. (eds.) (2005). Beyond a Joke: The Limits of Humour. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Looooooka. (2010). ‘Just another office prank’. URL: http://youtu.be/vpFVCI3TYrM. Archived at http://www.webcitation.org/6VjAujMvi.
Mannell, R. & La Fave, L. (1976). ‘Humour judgements and the “playful attitude”’, in Lancey, D. F. & Tindall, B. A. (eds.), The Anthropological Study of Play: Problems and Prospects, Cornwall, NY: Leisure Press, pp. 230-238.
Marsh, M. (2012). ‘Foiled again: The playful ethics and aesthetics of jokes’. Western Folklore 71 (3/4), pp. 291-306.
Marsh, M. (2015). Practically Joking. Logan: Utah State University Press.
MIT Museum. (2012). ‘The hacker ethic’. URL: http://hacks.mit.edu/misc/ethics.html. Archived at http://www.webcitation.org/6ViKt3hBG.
Plester, B. & Orams, M. (2008). ‘Send in the clowns: The role of the joker in three New Zealand IT companies’. Humour 21 (3), pp. 253-281.
Siporin, S. (1994). ‘Halloween pranks: “Just a little inconvenience”’, in Santino, J. (ed.), Halloween and Other Festivals of Death and Life, Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, pp. 45-61.
Smith, M. (2009). ‘Humour, unlaughter, and boundary maintenance’. Journal of American Folklore 122 (484), pp. 148-171.
Veatch, T.C. (1998). ‘A theory of humour’. Humour 11 (2), pp. 161-215.
Yougotpranked.com. (2006). ‘You got pranked’. URL: http://web.archive.org/web/20060210061826/http://yougotpranked.com.