The context for the paper is the inclusion of a 64-year old cartoon in the Political Science textbook that caused an uproar in the Indian parliament in 2012. The controversy draws attention to the two-facedness of any political cartoon which is an artistic representation of a historical event. It is, hence, ambivalent by being an expression of artistic freedom as well as a humorous comment on history where the axis of representation intersects the axis of history. The representation of the Dalit icon, Ambedkar, was objectionable to the political party espousing the Dalit cause which, through its leader, Tirumavalavan, raised the issue in parliament. The paper posits that the reaction was an event that was hitherto dormant and that it erupted on account of elements that fed its potential for virality in the environment, thereby, turning it into a fact. To this end, the paper revives interest in the imitation theory of the French sociologist, Gabriel Tarde, who, incidentally, was an intellectual influence on Ambedkar. Moreover, it employs Zeno Vendler’s distinction between an “event” and a „fact”, the Deleuzian idea of “assemblage,” and the idea of “conceptual metaphor” as laid out by Lakoff and Johnson. The paper reads the vicissitudes of the cartoon in order to theorize the elements that cause virality in a communicative environment.
About The Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP).’ Bahujan Samaj Party in India. Retrieved 14 July 2019 from http://www.bspindia.org/about-bsp.php.
‘Ambedkar cartoon rocks Parliament, Sibal apologises – Times of India.’ 11 May 2012. The Times of India. Retrieved 14 July 2019 from http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Ambedkar-cartoon-rocks-Parliament-Sibal-apologises/articleshow/13094325.cms.
Alliez, E. (1996). Capital Times: Tales from the Conquest of Time. Foreword. Gilles Deleuze and Trans. George Vand Den Abbeele. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Arendt, H. (1963). Eichmann in Jerusalem A Report on the Banality of Evil. New York: Viking.
Barthes, R. (1974). S/Z, trans. Richard Miller Hill and Wang. Oxford: Blackwell.
Barthes, R. (1977). ‘Rhetoric of the Image.’ Image–Music–Text. Trans. Stephen Heath. New York: Hill and Wang, pp. 32–51.
Born, G. (2010). ‘On Tardean relations: temporality and ethnography.’ In Candea M. (ed.), The Social after Gabriel Tarde: Debates and assessments. Abingdon: Routledge.
Canetti, E. (1962). Crowds and Power. Trans. Carol Stewart. London: Continuum.
Carey, J. (1999). Suspension of Perception. Attention, Spectacle and Modern Culture. Cambridge: MIT Press.
De Man, P. (1971). Blindness and Insight: Essays in the Rhetoric of Contemporary criticism. Oxford: University of Oxford Press.
Deleuze, G. & Felix, G. (1987). A Thousand Plateaus Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Eliot, T. S. (1972 ). ‘Tradition and the Individual Talent.’ In Lodge, D. and Wood, N. (eds.), 20th Century Literary Criticism: A Reader. Harlow: Longman.
Empson, W. (2004). Seven Types of Ambiguity. New York: Random House.
Foucault, M. (2012). The Archaeology of Knowledge. New York: Vintage.
Fuller, M. (2005). Media Ecologies. Materialist Energies in Art and Technoculture. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Gallagher, C. & Greenblatt, S. (2000). Practicing New Historicism. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Grossberg, L. (1996). ‘Identity and cultural studies: is that all there is?’ In Hall, S. and Du Gay, P. (eds.), Questions of Cultural Identities. California: Sage, pp. 87-107.
Ilaiah, K. (2009). Post-Hindu India: A Discourse in Dalit-Bahujan, Socio-Spiritual and Scientific Revolution. California: Sage.
‘India parliament row over Dalit icon Ambedkar cartoon.’ (2012). 11 May 2012. BBC News. Retrieved 14 July 2019 from http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-18031128.
Jakobson, Roman (1988). ‘Linguistics and poetics.’ In Lodge, D. and Wood, N. (eds.), Modern Criticism and Theory: A Reader. Harlow: Longman, pp. 31-54.
Kreisler, H. (2003). ‘Identity and change in the network society, with Manuel Castells (Conversations with History).’ Conversations with History, 16 June 2003. Retrieved 14 July 2019 from http://conversations.berkeley.edu/content/manuel-castells.
Kroker, A. & Kroker, M. ed. (2013). Critical Digital Studies: A Reader. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. (2008). The Political Mind. London: Penguin.
Lockyer, S. & Pickering, M. ed. (2005). Beyond a Joke: The Limits of Humour. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
McLuhan, M. & Fiore, Q. (1996). The Medium as the Message. California: Gingko.
Morreall, J. (1983). Taking Laughter Seriously. New York: State University of New York.
Negroponte, N. (1995). Being Digital. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
Nietzsche, F. (2006). Thus Spoke Zarathustra. Del Caro, A. and Pippin, R. (eds.). Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.
Pai, S. (2016). ‘Rise of Mayawati in Hindi heartland is a remarkable phenomenon.’ The Indian Express, 22 Jan 2016. Retrieved 14 July 2019 from http://indianexpress.com/article/blogs/rise-of-mayawati-in-hindi-heartland-is-a-remarkable-phenomenon/.
Park, E, R. (1923). ‘Natural History of the Newspaper.’ The American Journal of Sociology. XXIX. no 3. pp 273-289. Retrieved 14 July 2019 from https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2764232.pdf?refreqid=excelsior:d0e047d44161d54199dcce2b7e2efb29.
‘A Report of the Committee Constituted for Reviewing the Textbooks of Social Sciences/ Political Sciences for Classes IX-XII.’ (2012). 14 May 2012 Constituted by NCERT. www.ncert.nic.in.
Ricoeur, P. (1998). ‘Violence and language.’ Bulletin de la Société Americaine de philosophie de langue Française 10, no. 2. pp 32–41. Retrieved 14 July 2019 from http://www.jffp.org/ojs/index.php/jffp/article/viewFile/410/404.
Sabhlok, S. (2009). Braking Free of Nehru: Lets Unleash India. London: Anthem.
Sampson, T. D. (2012). Virality Contagion Theory in the Age of Networks. Minneapolis University of Minnesota.
Sathe, M. (2012). ‘Redrawing Shankar for today’s world.’ The Hindu, 03 Aug 2012. Retrieved 14 July 2019 from http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/redrawing-shankar-for-todays-world/article3723640.ece.
‘Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes.’ United Nations in India. Retrieved 14 July 2019 from http://in.one.un.org/task-teams/scheduled-castes-and-scheduled-tribes/.
Shankar, K. (1983). Don’t Spare me Shankar. New Delhi: Children’s Book Trust.
Smith, B. (ed.) (1988). Foundations of Gestalt Theory. Munich and Vienna: Philosophia.
Srivatsan, R. (2008). ‘From Ambedkar to Thakkar: towards a geneology of our activism.’ Economics and Politically Weakly. 43. no 39. pp 96–102. Retrieved 14 July 2019 from https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40278006.pdf?refreqid=excelsior%3Ab731be34e4b8553da8bc62e88ecf72ca.
Tarde, G. (1903). The Laws of Imitation. New York: Henry Holt.
The Terminator. (1984). Directed by James Cameron. Performed by Arnold Schwarzenegger. USA: Hemdale Pacific Western Productions Cinema ’84/ Orion Pictures. DVD.
Thrift, N. (2008). Non-Representational Theory. Abingdon: Routledge.
Toews, D. (2003). ‘The new Tarde: sociology after the end of the social.’ Theory, Culture & Society, 20(5), 81–98. doi:10.1177/02632764030205004
Vendler, Z. (1974). ‘Facts and events.’ In Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca: University of Cornell Press, pp. 122–146.
‘What has marred India’s Governance since Independence and can the Modi Model provide the answers?’ (2014). Penguin India Blog, 18 April 2014. Retrieved 14 July 2019 from https://penguinindiablog.wordpress.com/2014/04/18/what-has-marred-indias-governance-since-independence-and-
Wiedmer, C. (2010). ‘The politics of reading street newspapers.’ PMLA 125, no. 2. pp 437– 42. doi:10.1632/pmla.2010.125.2.437